<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
 >

<channel>
 <title>7ASecurity Blog</title>
 <atom:link href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
 <link>https://7asecurity.com/blog/</link>
 <description>7ASecurity Blog With Cybersecurity Tips and Tools</description>
 <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 06:42:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
 <language>en-US</language>
 <sy:updatePeriod>
 hourly </sy:updatePeriod>
 <sy:updateFrequency>
 1 </sy:updateFrequency>


 
 <item>
  <title>Mobile App Security Training: A Skills Guide for Android and iOS Pentest Courses</title>
  <link>https://7asecurity.com/blog/mobile-app-security-training/</link>

  <dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
  <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 06:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[7CMP Certification]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Android Penetration Testing]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[AppSec Education]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Hands-On Pentesting]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[iOS Pentesting Course]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Mobile App Security Training]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Mobile Vulnerabilities]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[OWASP MASTG]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[OWASP MASVS]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Security Certifications]]></category>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>Mobile app security training builds in layers. Foundational concepts come first. Then platform-specific depth in Android and iOS followed by fluency in OWASP's MASVS and MASTG. Finally, hands-on practice against genuine vulnerable apps. Skip the fundamentals, and gaps surface the moment an app does something unfamiliar. Practical, audit-based certification closes the last gap. It tests &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/mobile-app-security-training/">Mobile App Security Training: A Skills Guide for Android and iOS Pentest Courses</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/">7ASecurity Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>



   </item>
  <item>
  <title>OWASP Top 10 Testing Guide: How Pentesters Validate Exploitability</title>
  <link>https://7asecurity.com/blog/owasp-top-10-testing-guide/</link>

  <dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
  <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 06:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Application Security]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Broken Access Control]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Business Logic Testing]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Manual Pentesting]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[OWASP Top 10]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Penetration Testing]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Security Misconfiguration]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Software Supply Chain Failures]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Vulnerability Validation]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Web Application Security]]></category>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>OWASP Top 10 testing means validating all 10 categories in the current 2025 edition manually. Security Misconfiguration jumped from fifth to second place. Two categories, Software Supply Chain Failures and Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions, were added. A scanner handles categories like Injection well. Broken Access Control and Insecure Design depend on business logic no scanner &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/owasp-top-10-testing-guide/">OWASP Top 10 Testing Guide: How Pentesters Validate Exploitability</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/">7ASecurity Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>



   </item>
  <item>
  <title>OWASP AI Top 10 2026: The Rankings Just Had Their Biggest Shakeup Yet</title>
  <link>https://7asecurity.com/blog/owasp-ai-top-10-2026/</link>

  <dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
  <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 06:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Agentic Workflows]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[AI Pentesting]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Excessive Agency]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[LLM Security]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Misinformation Risks]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[OWASP 2026 Update]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[OWASP AI Top 10]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Prompt Injection]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Security Frameworks]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[vulnerability management]]></category>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>The OWASP AI Top 10 just got a genuine shake-up, not a reshuffle. OWASP built the 2026 edition partly on real incident data for the first time, not practitioner opinion alone, and the rankings moved to match. Excessive Agency jumped from sixth to third. Improper Output Handling fell from fifth to tenth. This means that &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/owasp-ai-top-10-2026/">OWASP AI Top 10 2026: The Rankings Just Had Their Biggest Shakeup Yet</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/">7ASecurity Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>



   </item>
  <item>
  <title>Active Directory Penetration Testing: How Engagements Work</title>
  <link>https://7asecurity.com/blog/active-directory-penetration-testing-engagements/</link>

  <dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 06:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Active Directory Security]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Attack Path Mapping]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Credential Harvesting]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Domain Dominance]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Identity Management]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Internal Network Pentesting]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Kerberoasting]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Lateral Movement]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Privilege Escalation]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Vulnerability Remediation]]></category>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>Active Directory penetration testing runs through five phases. 1. Scoping the starting position. 2. Gaining an initial foothold. 3. Harvesting credentials. 4. Escalating privilege. 5. Proving domain dominance. Each phase builds on the last one's findings. The report prioritises fixes based on which finding collapses the most paths to domain control. Most breaches involving Active &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/active-directory-penetration-testing-engagements/">Active Directory Penetration Testing: How Engagements Work</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/">7ASecurity Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>



   </item>
  <item>
  <title>Five Kubernetes Security Gaps Attackers Chain Together</title>
  <link>https://7asecurity.com/blog/kubernetes-security-gaps/</link>

  <dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
  <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 07:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Cloud Native Audit]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Cloud Security Testing]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[CNCF projects]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Container Security]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Infrastructure Pentesting]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Kubernetes Attack Paths]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Kubernetes Hardening]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Kubernetes Security]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Network Policies]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[RBAC Configuration]]></category>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>Kubernetes security testing checks whether a cluster's controls hold up under an attacker's logic, not just whether they exist on paper. There are five misconfiguration categories our testers find most often. 1) RBAC gaps granting too much access. 2) Exposed control-plane components. 3) Missing network policies. 4) Unsafe pod defaults. 5) Weak admission control. Pentesters &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/kubernetes-security-gaps/">Five Kubernetes Security Gaps Attackers Chain Together</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/">7ASecurity Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>



   </item>
  <item>
  <title>What Cloud Misconfiguration Looks Like in a Real Audit</title>
  <link>https://7asecurity.com/blog/cloud-misconfiguration-real-audit/</link>

  <dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
  <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 08:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Cloud Audit]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Cloud Misconfiguration]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Cloud Penetration Testing]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[cloud security]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[CSPM Limitations]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[IAM Security]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Privilege Escalation]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Third-Party Risk]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Verizon DBIR 2026]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Vulnerability Remediation]]></category>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>Cloud misconfiguration turns up in four recurring patterns. 1) Over-permissioned roles give an attacker a path to sensitive data. 2) Management interfaces sit reachable without MFA. 3) Account trust goes unreviewed, and 4) logging exists but nobody watches it. A CSPM tool flags each as a setting. What decides whether it's exploitable is whether a &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/cloud-misconfiguration-real-audit/">What Cloud Misconfiguration Looks Like in a Real Audit</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/">7ASecurity Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>



   </item>
  <item>
  <title>Bayanat audit by 7ASecurity</title>
  <link>https://7asecurity.com/blog/bayanat-audit-by-7asecurity/</link>

  <dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
  <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 08:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[API security]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[authorization]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Bayanat]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[deployment hardening]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[evidence management]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Fuzzing]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[human rights documentation]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[import/export security]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Open Source Security]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Security Audit]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[SJAC]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[SLSA]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[supply chain security]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Threat modeling]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Web Security]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[whitebox review]]></category>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>7ASecurity shares results of a Bayanat security audit: 32 working days, 7 work packages, 22 findings, 21 hardening recommendations, supply-chain review, threat model, and fix verification.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/bayanat-audit-by-7asecurity/">Bayanat audit by 7ASecurity</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/">7ASecurity Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>



   </item>
  <item>
  <title>OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications: How to Test Production AI Apps</title>
  <link>https://7asecurity.com/blog/owasp-top-10-llm-applications/</link>

  <dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
  <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 08:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Agentic Workflows]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[AI Application Security]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Data and Model Poisoning]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[EU AI Act Compliance]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Excessive Agency]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[LLM Pentesting]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[MITRE ATLAS]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[OWASP LLM Top 10]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Prompt Injection]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Vulnerability Validation]]></category>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>The OWASP LLM Top 10 names ten specific risks in LLM-powered apps: prompt injection, data leakage, excessive agency, and seven more, each with its own attack pattern. Testing against these risks means chaining a planted instruction through to real data exposure or confirming that rate limits cap costs, rather than just documenting that they should. &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/owasp-top-10-llm-applications/">OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications: How to Test Production AI Apps</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/">7ASecurity Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>



   </item>
  <item>
  <title>How to Choose Between AI Red Teaming and an AI Security Assessment</title>
  <link>https://7asecurity.com/blog/ai-red-teaming-vs-ai-penetration-testing/</link>

  <dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
  <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 08:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Adversarial Testing]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[AI Penetration Testing]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[AI Red Teaming]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[AI security]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[autonomous agents]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Cyber Defense]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[LLM Vulnerabilities]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[MITRE ATLAS]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[OWASP Top 10]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Security Assessments]]></category>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>AI red teaming and AI penetration testing are not the same thing. AI penetration testing looks for every possible vulnerability to build a secure baseline. AI red teaming simulates a targeted attack to test your detection and response capabilities. Choose an AI security assessment based on your current operational maturity. People use the terms "AI &#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/ai-red-teaming-vs-ai-penetration-testing/">How to Choose Between AI Red Teaming and an AI Security Assessment</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/">7ASecurity Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>



   </item>
  <item>
  <title>Incus security audit by 7ASecurity</title>
  <link>https://7asecurity.com/blog/incus-security-audit-7asecurity/</link>

  <dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
  <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 10:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
    <category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[7ASecurity;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[API security;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[authorization;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[container security;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[guest isolation;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Incus;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Linux Containers;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[multi-tenant security;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[open source security;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[parser fuzzing;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[security audit;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[SLSA;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[Sovereign Tech Agency;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[supply chain security;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[threat modeling;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[virtual machine security;]]></category>
  <category><![CDATA[whitebox testing;]]></category>


     <description><![CDATA[<p>7ASecurity publishes an independent Incus audit: all 14 vulnerabilities and 14 of 17 hardening recommendations were resolved and independently verified.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/incus-security-audit-7asecurity/">Incus security audit by 7ASecurity</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://7asecurity.com/blog/">7ASecurity Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>



   </item>
 </channel>
</rss>
